By Susann Wagenknecht
This booklet investigates how collaborative clinical perform yields medical wisdom. At a time while such a lot of today’s clinical wisdom is created in learn teams, the writer reconsiders the social personality of technological know-how to handle the query of no matter if collaboratively created wisdom may be regarded as collective fulfillment, and if this is the case, within which experience. Combining philosophical research with qualitative empirical inquiry, this booklet presents a comparative case learn of mono- and interdisciplinary learn teams, providing perception into the daily perform of scientists. The ebook contains box observations and interviews with scientists to offer an empirically-grounded viewpoint on much-debated questions bearing on learn teams’ department of work, family members of epistemic dependence and trust.
Read Online or Download A Social Epistemology of Research Groups PDF
Similar epistemology books
Put up yr notice: First released in 2000
History of the Mind-Body challenge is a set of recent essays by way of prime members at the numerous issues that experience given upward thrust to and expert the mind-body challenge in philosophy.
The essays during this stellar assortment speak about well-known philosophers similar to Aristotle, Aquinas and Descartes and canopy the themes of the origins of the qualia and intentionality.
Invoice Brewer offers an unique view of the position of unsleeping adventure within the acquisition of empirical wisdom. He argues that perceptual reviews needs to offer purposes for empirical ideals if there are to be any determinate ideals in any respect approximately specific items on the planet. This clean method of epistemology turns clear of the quest for valuable and enough stipulations for wisdom and works as an alternative from a thought of figuring out in a selected zone.
Epistemology, as usually understood via philosophers of technological know-how, is quite distant from the heritage of technological know-how and from ancient issues typically. Rheinberger indicates that, from the past due 19th during the overdue 20th century, a parallel, replacement discourse sought to return to phrases with the particularly basic adventure of the thoroughgoing clinical alterations attributable to the revolution in physics.
- Perception and Reason
- Truth, Knowledge and Modality (Philosophical Papers of Georg Henrik Von Wright, Vol 3)
- Problems from Locke
- Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: Major Texts in Philosophy
- Evolutionary Epistemology and Scientific Realism
Additional info for A Social Epistemology of Research Groups
Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39(1), 79–88. Katz, J. , & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26 (1), 1–18. Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinary. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. ), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wagenknecht, S. (2013). Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups. Synthese, 190(11), 1881–1898. Balog, C. (1979/1980). Multiple authorship and author collaboration in agricultural research publications. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2, 159–169. Beaver, D. , & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I – the professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(1), 64–84. Beaver, D. , & Rosen, R. (1979a). Studies in scientific collaboration: Part III – professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship.
88); Poulsen (2001). 1 The Phenomenon 23 and, to a significant degree, a professional reputation and fate” (Hackett, 2005, p. 788). Shared resource access, as the historian Jane Maienschein notes, is a major motivation for an individual scientist to enter a research collaboration in the first place, as they are “eligible for resources that individual researchers could not obtain” (Maienschein, 1993, p. 167). The sharing of resources helps increase both the efficiency of scientific labor and the credibility of research outcome.
A Social Epistemology of Research Groups by Susann Wagenknecht